Loading...
The Influence of FDI on Economic Growth Under the Endogenous Growth Model


Journal of Digital Business and International Marketing

Received On : 02 January 2025

Revised On : 06 February 2025

Accepted On : 16 February 2025

Published On : 05 April 2025

Volume 01, Issue 02, 2025

Pages : 066–075


Abstract

We examined the interaction between Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and Economic Growth (EG), which has been an area of interest for both academics and policy makers since the early 1990s, with most scholars concluding that FDI has a positive impact on EG through the enhancement of capital, technology and human capital. However, the ability of FDI to catalyze growth varies with the policies and institutions of the host economy. In pursuing this objective, this study seeks to assess the long-run effectiveness of FDI in the growth of EG, using a dynamic panel econometric model predicated on the endogenous growth model. Some of the independent variables tested in the analysis are FDI to GDP ratio, institutional quality indices and the macroeconomic variables to give a broader view on the issue. The findings reveal that the effect of FDI on EG is positively improved by enhanced institutional quality in reference to better governmental and business liberalization. There is a positive and statistically significant impact of governmental freedom on the relationship between FDI and EG where a 1% improvement in governmental freedom raises the effect of FDI on EG by 0.36%. However, the same improvement in business freedom raises this effect by only 0.08%. On the other hand, FDI inflows uncertainty, which is likely to erode these positive growth advantages, is negatively related with, and signifies by 0.028% points less impact in EG for every 1% increase in FDI volatility.

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment, Economic Growth, Social and Economic Frameworks, FDI Volatility, Institutional Policy, FDI-Growth Relationship.

  1. F. R. Root, “Empirical determinants of manufacturing direct foreign investment in developing countries,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 751–767, Jul. 1979, doi: 10.1086/451139.
  2. J. O. Adelegan, “Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in Nigeria: A Seemingly Unrelated Model,” African Review of Money Finance and Banking, pp. 5–25, Jan. 2000, [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/23026281.pdf
  3. J. of A. Transportation, “Retracted: forecasting foreign direct investment inflow to Egypt and determinates: using machine learning algorithms and ARIMA model,” Journal of Advanced Transportation, vol. 2023, p. 1, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/9796236.
  4. S. M. N. Sakib, “The 2003 US Intervention of Iraq: Objectives, Implications, and Global Security Dynamics,” in Handbook of Migration, International Relations and Security in Asia, 2024, pp. 1–20. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-8001-7_10-1.
  5. G. Bardsen, Ø. Eitrheim, E. S. Jansen, and R. Nymoen, The econometrics of macroeconomic modelling. 2005. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780199246496.001.0001.
  6. J. M. Mayer and I. J. Rhile, “Thermodynamics and kinetics of proton-coupled electron transfer: stepwise vs. concerted pathways,” Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, vol. 1655, pp. 51–58, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2003.07.002.
  7. A. Pavel and O. Moldovan, “Determining local economic development in the rural areas of Romania. Exploring the role of exogenous factors,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 282, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11010282.
  8. S. Nupehewa, S. Liyanage, D. Polkotuwa, M. Thiyagarajah, R. Jayathilaka, and A. Lokeshwara, “More than just investment: Causality analysis between foreign direct investment and economic growth,” PLoS ONE, vol. 17, no. 11, p. e0276621, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276621.
  9. M. Qamruzzaman and W. Jianguo, “The asymmetric relationship between financial development, trade openness, foreign capital flows, and renewable energy consumption: Fresh evidence from panel NARDL investigation,” Renewable Energy, vol. 159, pp. 827–842, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.069.
  10. U. Beck and C. Lau, “Second modernity as a research agenda: theoretical and empirical explorations in the ‘meta‐change’ of modern society,” British Journal of Sociology, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 525–557, Nov. 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00082.x.
  11. R. Vernon, “International investment and international trade in the product cycle,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 80, no. 2, p. 190, May 1966, doi: 10.2307/1880689.
  12. H. Krolzig, “General‐to‐Specific model selection procedures for structural vector autoregressions*,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 65, no. s1, pp. 769–801, Dec. 2003, doi: 10.1046/j.0305-9049.2003.00088.x.
  13. G. Wang, A. Sarkar, P. Carbonetto, and M. Stephens, “A Simple New Approach to Variable Selection in Regression, with Application to Genetic Fine Mapping,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology), vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 1273–1300, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1111/rssb.12388.
  14. L. Anselin, “Under the hood Issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models,” Agricultural Economics, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 247–267, Nov. 2002, doi: 10.1016/s0169-5150(02)00077-4.
  15. F. U. Rehman and M. M. Islam, “Financial infrastructure—total factor productivity (TFP) nexus within the purview of FDI outflow, trade openness, innovation, human capital and institutional quality: Evidence from BRICS economies,” Applied Economics, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 783–801, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2094333.
  16. M. Busse and J. L. Groizard, “Foreign Direct Investment, regulations and growth,” World Economy, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 861–886, Jul. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2008.01106.x.
  17. J. Dunning, International Production and the Multinational Enterprise (RLE International Business). 2013. doi: 10.4324/9780203077818.
  18. A. B. Dankyi, O. J. Abban, K. Yusheng, and T. P. Coulibaly, “Human capital, foreign direct investment, and economic growth: Evidence from ECOWAS in a decomposed income level panel,” Environmental Challenges, vol. 9, p. 100602, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.envc.2022.100602.
CRediT Author Statement

The author reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank to the reviewers for nice comments on the manuscript.

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Ethics Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Availability of Data and Materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.

Author Information

Contributions

All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding Author



Rights and permissions

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

This license permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, reproduction, and adaptation in any medium or format, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.

Copyright

© 2025 Ravikumar M. The author(s) retain copyright of the work. The author(s) grant the Journal of Digital Business and International Marketing (JDBIM) and its publisher, Ansis Publications, the right of first publication and the right to identify itself as the original publisher of the article.

Cite this Article

Ravikumar M, “The Influence of FDI on Economic Growth Under the Endogenous Growth Model”, Journal of Digital Business and International Marketing, vol.1, no.2, pp. 066–075, April 2025, doi: 10.64026/JDBIM/2025008.