A Multilevel Cross-Regional Analysis of Gendered Digital Inequality in Underserved Contexts
Journal of Digital Business and International Marketing
Received On : 23 November 2025
Revised On : 30 December 2025
Accepted On : 10 January 2026
Published On : 05 April 2026
Volume 02, Issue 02, 2026
Pages : 060-071
Abstract
Gendered digital divide is a long-standing international issue, especially in situations where it has not been fully analyzed, thus limiting the place of women in digital economies and societies on similar grounds. The research paper presents a qualitative synthesis with a quantitative aspect of 93 peer-reviewed sources and clarifies the overwhelming prevalence of women-specific digital barriers across the access, utilization, and outcome dimensions. Methodologically, the investigation addresses the multidimensionality and intersectionality nature of women to be digitally excluded and coded by theme, frequency, assessed regionally, and synthesized by network. Findings show that first-, second-, and third-order variations in digital divides are significantly geographically uneven, and education and digital skill levels turn out to be prevailing limitations to the reduction of digital inequality, especially to women in underserved and marginalized communities.
Keywords
Gendered Digital Inequality, Underserved Communities, Women’s Digital Inclusion, Digital Inequality, Technology Adoption.
- S. Ghobadi and Z. Ghobadi, “How access gaps interact and shape digital divide: a cognitive investigation,” Behaviour & Information Technology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 330–340, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1080/0144929x.2013.833650.
- A. M. Laleye, “Practical and Technological Skills: An Inevitable Social Engineering Tool for Sustainable Development,” European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 171–177, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.2.318.
- C. Ball, J. Francis, K.-T. Huang, T. Kadylak, S. R. Cotten, and R. V. Rikard, “The Physical–Digital Divide: Exploring the Social Gap Between Digital Natives and Physical Natives,” Journal of Applied Gerontology, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1167–1184, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1177/0733464817732518.
- S. Stevenson, “Digital Divide: A Discursive Move Away from the Real Inequities,” The Information Society, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–22, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1080/01972240802587539.
- R. S. Sharma, E. W. J. Ng, M. Dharmawirya, and C. Keong Lee, “Beyond the digital divide: a conceptual framework for analyzing knowledge societies,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 151–164, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1108/13673270810903000.
- A. Acilar and Ø. Sæbø, “Towards understanding the gender digital divide: a systematic literature review,” Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 233–249, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1108/gkmc-09-2021-0147.
- M. Warschauer and T. Matuchniak, “New Technology and Digital Worlds: Analyzing Evidence of Equity in Access, Use, and Outcomes,” Review of Research in Education, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 179–225, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.3102/0091732x09349791.
- J. James, “From Origins to Implications: Key Aspects in the Debate over the Digital Divide,” Journal of Information Technology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 284–295, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000097.
- R. Brignardello-Petersen, N. Santesso, and G. H. Guyatt, “Systematic reviews of the literature: an introduction to current methods,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 194, no. 2, pp. 536–542, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae232.
- G. B. Nkoumou Ngoa and J. S. Song, “Female participation in African labor markets: The role of information and communication technologies,” Telecommunications Policy, vol. 45, no. 9, p. 102174, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102174.
- L. Li, “Reskilling and Upskilling the Future-ready Workforce for Industry 4.0 and Beyond,” Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1697–1712, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10796-022-10308-y.
- A. T. Rashid, “Digital Inclusion and Social Inequality: Gender Differences in ICT Access and Use in Five Developing Countries,” Gender, Technology and Development, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 306–332, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1177/0971852416660651.
- D. R. Morrow, “When Technologies Makes Good People Do Bad Things: Another Argument Against the Value-Neutrality of Technologies,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 329–343, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9464-1.
- P. Brey, “The Technological Construction of Social Power,” Social Epistemology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 71–95, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1080/02691720701773551.
- H. Ahl and S. Marlow, “Exploring the false promise of entrepreneurship through a postfeminist critique of the enterprise policy discourse in Sweden and the UK,” Human Relations, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 41–68, May 2019, doi: 10.1177/0018726719848480.
- L. J. Dixon et al., “Gendered Space: The Digital Divide between Male and Female Users in Internet Public Access Sites,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 991–1009, May 2014, doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12088.
- M. Charles, R. Friedland, J. Afary, and R. Yang, “Complicating Patriarchy: Gender Beliefs of Muslim Facebook Users in the Middle East, North Africa, and South Asia,” Gender & Society, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 91–123, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1177/08912432221137909.
- A. Armenta, A. Serrano, M. Cabrera, and R. Conte, “The new digital divide: the confluence of broadband penetration, sustainable development, technology adoption and community participation,” Information Technology for Development, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 345–353, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1080/02681102.2011.625925.
- L. Spangenberg and H. W. Pretorius, “Holistic Factors that Impact the Under-Representation of Women in ICT: A Systematic Literature Review,” Proceedings of Fifth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology, pp. 195–209, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-5856-6_19.
CRediT Author Statement
The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows:
Conceptualization: Anandakumar Haldorai and Lin Xiu; Methodology: Lin Xiu; Data Curation: Lin Xiu; Writing- Original Draft Preparation: Anandakumar Haldorai; Visualization: Anandakumar Haldorai; Supervision: Anandakumar Haldorai; Validation: Anandakumar Haldorai and Lin Xiu; Writing- Reviewing and Editing: Anandakumar Haldorai and Lin Xiu; All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Acknowledgements
Author(s) thanks to Dr. Anandakumar Haldorai for this research completion and support.
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Ethics Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Availability of Data and Materials
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.
Author Information
Contributions
All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding Author
Rights and permissions
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This license permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, reproduction, and adaptation in any medium or format, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
Copyright
© 2026 Anandakumar Haldorai and Lin Xiu. The author(s) retain copyright of the work. The author(s) grant the Journal of Digital Business and International Marketing (JDBIM) and its publisher, Ansis Publications, the right of first publication and the right to identify itself as the original publisher of the article.
Cite this Article
Anandakumar Haldorai and Lin Xiu, “A Multilevel Cross-Regional Analysis of Gendered Digital Inequality in Underserved Contexts”, Journal of Digital Business and International Marketing, vol.2, no.2, pp. 060-071, April 2026, doi: 10.64026/JDBIM/2026007.