Chemical Recycling Pathways for Agricultural Plastics - A Comparative Technology Assessment
Journal of Smart and Sustainable Farming
Received On : 10 March 2025
Revised On : 15 May 2025
Accepted On : 30 June 2025
Published On : 25 July 2025
Volume 01, 2025
Pages : 110-118
Abstract
Tertiary (chemical) recycling is the process of breaking down plastic polymers into their individual monomers, which are then reconstructed to create new polymers to produce fresh plastic goods. Tertiary recycling includes methods such as cracking and gasification. Chemical recycling techniques, such as catalytic cracking, pyrolysis, microwave-assisted pyrolysis (MAP), plasma pyrolysis, may effectively extract polymers from mixed rubbish and municipal solid waste. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of four main types of plastics recycling and eight chemical recycling systems, with a specific focus on cracking and gasification methods. The selection of technologies was based on a thorough examination of existing literature, and their evaluation was conducted by considering significant performance characteristics, peer-reviewed scientific publications, information supplied by technology developers, and expert interviews. The primary objective of the research is to conduct a comparative analysis of technologies that use publicly accessible data. The research only examines tertiary (chemical) recycling techniques, excluding other approaches like bio recycling. The findings underscore the potential of chemical recycling to provide a self-sustaining framework for plastics and examine the challenges and benefits linked to different recycling methods.
Keywords
Catalytic Cracking, Chemical Recycling, Microwave-Assisted Pyrolysis, Chemical Recycling Systems, Pyrolysis, Plasma Pyrolysis.
- C. Zhang, M. Hu, F. Di Maio, B. Sprecher, X. Yang, and A. Tukker, “An overview of the waste hierarchy framework for analyzing the circularity in construction and demolition waste management in Europe,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 803, p. 149892, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149892.
- Lee and M. S. Liew, “Tertiary recycling of plastics waste: an analysis of feedstock, chemical and biological degradation methods,” Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 32–43, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10163-020-01106-2.
- Rahimi and J. M. Garcı́A, “Chemical recycling of waste plastics for new materials production,” Nature Reviews Chemistry, vol. 1, no. 6, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1038/s41570-017-0046.
- M. A. Jacobs and M. Swink, “Product portfolio architectural complexity and operational performance: Incorporating the roles of learning and fixed assets,” Journal of Operations Management, vol. 29, no. 7–8, pp. 677–691, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2011.03.002.
- Y. Zhang, “Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: 1. Process design and technological assessment,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 1–16, Aug. 2003, doi: 10.1016/s0960-8524(03)00040-3.
- S. M. Capelli, J. P. Busalmen, and S. S. Sánchez, “Hydrocarbon bioremediation of a mineral-base contaminated waste from crude oil extraction by indigenous bacteria,” International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 233–238, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1016/s0964-8305(01)00050-6.
- Olechowski, S. D. Eppinger, and N. Joglekar, “Technology readiness levels at 40: A study of state-of-the-art use, challenges, and opportunities,” 2015 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1109/picmet.2015.7273196.
- J. Zhang, W. Zuo, C. Lin, L. Yin, and J. Zhang, “Sulfur Transformation during Microwave and Conventional Pyrolysis of Sewage Sludge,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 709–717, Dec. 2016, doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b03784.
- L. Fagbemi, “Pyrolysis products from different biomasses: application to the thermal cracking of tar,” Fuel and Energy Abstracts, vol. 43, no. 4, p. 279, Jul. 2002, doi: 10.1016/s0140-6701(02)86434-7.
- M. M. Hossain, “Design of an ideal gas regulating and metering station for gas supply to A 50 MW power plant,” 2009. [Online]. Available: http://lib.buet.ac.bd:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/4143?show=full
- Yan, P. Xu, J. Ye, and Y. Cheng, “Understanding coal/hydrocarbons pyrolysis in thermal plasma reactors by thermodynamic analysis,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 84, pp. 31–39, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2012.08.005.
- L. Tang, H. Huang, Z. Zhao, C. Wu, and Y. Chen, “Pyrolysis of polypropylene in a nitrogen plasma reactor,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1145–1150, Feb. 2003, doi: 10.1021/ie020469y.
- X. Cai and C. Du, “Thermal plasma treatment of medical waste,” Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–46, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11090-020-10119-6.
- N. Zhou et al., “Catalytic pyrolysis of plastic wastes in a continuous microwave assisted pyrolysis system for fuel production,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 418, p. 129412, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129412.
- X. Zhai et al., “Highly luminescent carbon nanodots by microwave-assisted pyrolysis,” Chemical Communications, vol. 48, no. 64, p. 7955, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1039/c2cc33869f.
- I. C. Pinheiro et al., “Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) process modeling, simulation, and control,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–29, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1021/ie200743c.
- N. Li, H. Liu, Z. Cheng, B. Yan, G. Chen, and S. Wang, “Conversion of plastic waste into fuels: A critical review,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 424, p. 127460, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127460.
- Sugiyama et al., “Waste Plastic Liquefaction Technology of Sapporo Plastic Recycle Corporation and Approach to Feedstock Recycling in near Future,” Kankyo Kogaku Sogo Shinpojiumu Koen Ronbunshu, vol. 2002.12, no. 0, pp. 232–235, Jan. 2002, doi: 10.1299/jsmeenv.2002.12.232.
CRediT Author Statement
The author reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Acknowledgements
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Ethics Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Availability of Data and Materials
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.
Author Information
Contributions
All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding Author
Rights and permissions
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This license permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, reproduction, and adaptation in any medium or format, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
Copyright
© 2025 Ae ran Lee. The author(s) retain copyright of the work. The author(s) grant the Journal of Smart and Sustainable Farming (JSSF) and its publisher, Ansis Publications, the right of first publication and the right to identify itself as the original publisher of the article.
Cite this Article
Ae ran Lee, “Chemical Recycling Pathways for Agricultural Plastics - A Comparative Technology Assessment”, Journal of Smart and Sustainable Farming, pp. 110-118, 2025, doi: 10.64026/JSSF/2025011.