Post-harvest loss forms a significant challenge to productivity of smallholder maize farmers especially those found in the developing nations, where lack of adequate storage technologies means that the grain is prone to pest infestations and thus deterioration. Two randomized encouragement design is used in this study where farmers were given a full-coverage (100%), or partial-coverage (50%), subsidy on the use of Purdue Improved Crop Storage (PICS) bags. Instrumental-variable estimation on the 543 household data shows that the level of adoption is significantly increased by the incentives that come as subsidies. The experimental results support that adding one PICS bag to the storage increases the maize storage by about 39 to 43 kg. Additionally, the adoption with the 100% subsidy leads to the reduction in post-harvest losses by about 10 kg, but the 50 subsidy brings weaker effects, which can be explained by the low adoption rates, thus, emphasizing the importance of strong financial incentives.
M. Yaseen et al., “Insect Pest Infestation During Storage of Cereal Grains, Pulses and Oilseeds,” in Health and Safety Aspects of Food Processing Technologies, 2019, pp. 209–234. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-24903-8_8.
A. Akelah, “Polymers in Food Packaging and Protection,” in Functionalized Polymeric Materials in Agriculture and the Food Industry, 2013, pp. 293–347. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-7061-8_6.
N. R. Yewle, R. L. Stroshine, R. P. K. Ambrose, and D. Baributsa, “Hermetic Bags: A Short-Term Solution to Preserve High-Moisture Maize during Grain Drying,” Foods, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 760, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.3390/foods13050760.
E. Preinfalk, B. Bednar-Friedl, J. Mayer, C. Lauk, and A. Mayer, “Sustainability transitions in the agri-food system: Evaluating mitigation potentials, economy-wide effects, co-benefits and trade-offs for the case of Austria,” Ecological Economics, vol. 226, p. 108357, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108357.
J. Guan and R. C. M. Yam, “Effects of government financial incentives on firms’ innovation performance in China: Evidences from Beijing in the 1990s,” Research Policy, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 273–282, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.001.
R. M. Ariong, D. M. Okello, M. H. Otim, and P. Paparu, “The cost of inadequate postharvest management of pulse grain: Farmer losses due to handling and storage practices in Uganda,” Agriculture & Food Security, vol. 12, no. 1, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40066-023-00423-7.
E. Redman and A. Redman, “Transforming sustainable food and waste behaviors by realigning domains of knowledge in our education system,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 64, pp. 147–157, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.016.
K. J. Bradford et al., “The dry chain: reducing postharvest losses and improving food safety in humid climates,” in Elsevier eBooks, 2020, pp. 375–389. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-817121-9.00017-6.
L. Eliasson, E. Anerud, Ö. Grönlund, and H. Von Hofsten, “Managing moisture content during storage of logging residues at landings – Effects of coverage strategies,” Renewable Energy, vol. 145, pp. 2510–2515, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.159.
L. J. S. Lukasse, J. E. De Kramer-Cuppen, and A. J. Van Der Voort, “A physical model to predict climate dynamics in ventilated bulk-storage of agricultural produce,” International Journal of Refrigeration, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 195–204, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2006.03.011.
G. J. Daglish, M. K. Nayak, F. H. Arthur, and C. G. Athanassiou, “Insect Pest Management in Stored Grain,” in Recent Advances in Stored Product Protection, 2018, pp. 45–63. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-56125-6_3.
B. Nath, G. Chen, C. M. O’Sullivan, and D. Zare, “Research and Technologies to Reduce Grain Postharvest Losses: a review,” Foods, vol. 13, no. 12, p. 1875, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.3390/foods13121875.
S. B. Williams, L. L. Murdock, and D. Baributsa, “Sorghum seed storage in Purdue Improved Crop Storage (PICS) bags and improvised containers,” Journal of Stored Products Research, vol. 72, pp. 138–142, May 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jspr.2017.04.004.
W. E. Bendinelli, C. T. Su, T. G. Péra, and J. V. C. Filho, “What are the main factors that determine post-harvest losses of grains?,” Sustainable Production and Consumption, vol. 21, pp. 228–238, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2019.09.002.
C. Tong, H. Gao, S. Luo, L. Liu, and J. Bao, “Impact of postharvest operations on rice grain quality: A review,” Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 626–640, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12439.
J. MacPherson et al., “Future agricultural systems and the role of digitalization for achieving sustainability goals. A review,” Agronomy for Sustainable Development, vol. 42, no. 4, p. 70, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13593-022-00792-6.
A. Ogunyiola and M. Gardezi, “Restoring sense out of disorder? Farmers’ changing social identities under big data and algorithms,” Agriculture and Human Values, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1451–1464, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10460-022-10334-1.
N. Gumbi, L. Gumbi, and H. Twinomurinzi, “Towards Sustainable Digital Agriculture for Smallholder Farmers: A Systematic Literature review,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 16, p. 12530, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151612530.
S. Karekezi and W. Kithyoma, “Renewable energy strategies for rural Africa: is a PV-led renewable energy strategy the right approach for providing modern energy to the rural poor of sub-Saharan Africa?,” Energy Policy, vol. 30, no. 11–12, pp. 1071–1086, Aug. 2002, doi: 10.1016/s0301-4215(02)00059-9.
O. J. Omotilewa, J. Ricker‐Gilbert, and J. H. Ainembabazi, “Subsidies for Agricultural Technology Adoption: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment with Improved Grain Storage Bags in Uganda,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 753–772, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1093/ajae/aay108.
CRediT Author Statement
The author reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Acknowledgements
Author(s) thanks to Department of Computer Science and Engineering for research lab and equipment support.
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Ethics Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Availability of Data and Materials
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.
Author Information
Contributions
All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding Author
Karthikeyan K
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, SNS College of Engineering, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
This license permits unrestricted use, sharing, distribution, reproduction, and adaptation in any medium or format, including for commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the source, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
Karthikeyan K, “Adoption Dynamics of Hermetic Storage Technology and Post Harvest Quality Outcomes in Maize Production”, Journal of Smart and Sustainable Farming, pp. 053-061, 2026, doi: 10.64026/JSSF/2026006.